Legal Opinion

Glass v. Wiltz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1986No. CA-3967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOBRANO, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is the correctness of a permanent injunction issued by the trial court which prohibited defendant-appellant from concealing, encumbering or disposing of a diamond ring, the ownership of which is the object of this suit.

Plaintiff sued defendant for the return of a diamond ring given to her in contemplation of marriage. The marriage was called off and plaintiff claims he is the owner of *1249the ring. Defendant asserts the opposite is true. The merits of those contentions are not before us as they are still pending.

Plaintiff filed a pleading…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Jackson v. Town of LogansportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Cochran v. CrosbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Montelepre, Inc. v. PfisterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Magnon v. LormandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dauphine v. Carencro High SchoolSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Stuart v. Haughton High SchoolLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. ETHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. McKayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API