Glass v. Wiltz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LOBRANO, Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is the correctness of a permanent injunction issued by the trial court which prohibited defendant-appellant from concealing, encumbering or disposing of a diamond ring, the ownership of which is the object of this suit.
Plaintiff sued defendant for the return of a diamond ring given to her in contemplation of marriage. The marriage was called off and plaintiff claims he is the owner of *1249the ring. Defendant asserts the opposite is true. The merits of those contentions are not before us as they are still pending.
Plaintiff filed a pleading…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Jackson v. Town of LogansportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cochran v. CrosbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Montelepre, Inc. v. PfisterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Magnon v. LormandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dauphine v. Carencro High SchoolSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Stuart v. Haughton High SchoolLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- ETHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. McKayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006