Legal Opinion

Menuez v. Julius Kindermann & Sons, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 30, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is an action for damages arising out of an alleged conversion by defendant warehouseman of certain goods, furniture, etc., stored by plaintiff with defendant as a warehouseman.

Plaintiff moves under rule 109(6) of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out an affirmative defense contained in the answer on the ground that it is insufficient in law. The defense alleges that “it was provided by the terms of a certain warehouse receipt issued by defendant to one Caroline B. Bird, * * * which said receipt is specifically referred to by the plaintiff in paragraph…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D'Utassy v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Glinsky v. Dunham & Reid, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Adams Express Co. v. Berry & Whitmore Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D'ALOISIO v. Morton's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Kaplan Products & Textiles, Inc. v. Chelsea Fireproof Storage Warehouse, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API