Legal Opinion
Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Barker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 28, 1996No. 96-227PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
In January 1994, the Arkansas State Highway Commission condemned .47 acre in fee, along with the access routes, belonging to Roland and Barbara Barker and Union State Bank, mortgagee, in order to widen Highway 167 to three lanes south of El Dorado. The condemned land was a part of a 10.16-acre tract purchased by the Barkers in 1992 for $20,000. A little over seven acres of the tract were timberland and not suitable for industrial or commercial use, and three acres were suitable for commercial or industrial use. The .47 acre condemned is in the three acres that are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Arkansas Sheriff's Boys' RanchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Yonts v. Public Service Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- City of El Dorado v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Young v. Arkansas State Highway Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. First Pyramid Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- GSS, LLC v. Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- City of Jacksonville v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. PostSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.