Legal Opinion

Blue Mound Farm Supply Co. v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The buildings in question were expressly designed to serve the purpose of farm structures. There was a sheep shed, two cattle and hog barns, and a brood shed. *619The very names of these buildings, located upon a farm of 112 acres, suggest that they are structures used in and connected with the operation of a farm. It is commonly known that farms are used for a variety of purposes. Some farms are primarily used for the raising of grain or corn; others are known as dairy farms; and still others are utilized for the raising of live stock to be sold upon the market. It is also commonly known at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Pleasant Prairie Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Luthe v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  2. Struebing v. American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API