Russo v. 40 Garden Street Partners
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants 40 Garden Street Partners and Van De Water & Van De Water, LLR appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J), dated February 18, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dowden v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Fuks v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Wall v. Village of MineolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Pohl v. SternbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ronconi v. Denzel AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lanos v. CronheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Lee-Pack v. 1 B 105 Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Barresi v. Putnam Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gourley v. YarmarkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.