Legal Opinion

Michael P. Schwab and Kathryn J. Kleinman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 7, 2011No. Docket 10525-07Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Holmes, Judge:

When a company winds up an employee-benefit plan and distributes its assets, section 402(b) 1 says an employee receiving his share of those assets has to pay tax on “the amount actually distributed.” Michael Schwab and his wife Kathryn Kleinman both received life-insurance policies as their share of an employee-benefit plan that was ending. They argue that surrender charges on both the policies made them worth nothing at the time of their receipt. The Commissioner argues that we must consider only what the insurance company calculated to be the policies’ “stated values”…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Willcutts v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. RyersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Guggenheim v. RasquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Colorado National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API