Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2001No. 00-1109PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On December 7, 1998, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court against respondent, Monica Ann Hansen Klaas of Wooster, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0065095, alleging that she had violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility: DR 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude), 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), 1-102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ShottOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BurkhartOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. KlaasOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KlaasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. KlaasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MartinezOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. MartinezOhio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API