Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brockney v. Centel Cellular Co. of Fort Walton Beach Ltd. Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 2007No. 1D05-4168Published

1DissentLewis, J.

I respectfully dissent because, in my view, the trial court erred in granting Cen-*450tel Cellular Company’s (“Centel”)1 motion for summary judgment on the ground that Centel had no duty to the decedent, Randy Brockney, under the facts of this case.

The decedent was an employee of Excel Communications (“Excel”), an independent contractor hired by Centel to mount antennas on its cellular telephone tower. The decedent was killed on April 18, 2002, while operating a four-wheel, all-terrain vehicle (“ATV”) during the course and scope of his employment as supervisor of an Excel maintenance crew, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. REGENCY LAKE APTS. ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. FrenchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Whitt v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. State v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API