John Doe 1, et al. v. University of San Francisco, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 San Francisco Division 10 JOHN DOE 1, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01559-LB 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 12 v. Re: ECF No. 516 13 UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this Title IX case, nineteen former USF baseball players claim that their baseball coaches 18 subjected them to sexualized misconduct and that USF and the coaches are responsible.1 Discovery 19 has been extensive.2 20 The defendants move for sanctions against certain plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Robert R. Estrada v. James K. Rowland J.S. Stainer R. Haase S. Sosa M. Melgado Garcia and N. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Englebrick v. Worthington Industries, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013