Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Durant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1998Published

1Dissent

Ritter, J.,

dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and order a new trial, with the following memorandum. In affirming this conviction, the majority is sustaining a verdict rendered by a jury selected in violation of a basic tenet of Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79), which is that race cannot be the reason for a peremptory challenge. The ultimate effect of such a determination is to permit a jury selection process in which the People’s peremptory challenge to a black juror was sustained despite the trial court’s finding that the People relied upon pretext when required to state a race-neutral…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. RichieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API