Legal Opinion · Dissent

Larson Concrete Co. v. Stroschein

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1984No. 14187Published

1DissentWollman, Justice

Although I agree with much of what Chief Justice Fosheim says in his dissent, I would agree with the majority opinion to the extent that there may be circumstances under which a supplier is charged with the duty of applying a contractor’s payment to the account incurred for the materials supplied to the owner’s premises. For example, if in the instant case contractor had endorsed owners’ payment check over to supplier, I think all would agree that the proceeds of that check would have had to first be applied to the account balance representing the concrete furnished to owners’ premises. Cf.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crescent Electric Supply Company v. Employers Mutual Casualty CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API