Legal Opinion

Reese v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 14, 1933No. Docket No. 62424Published

1. A fee paid by a trustee to a referee in a contested accounting, which under the trust is a factor which reduces trust income distributable to beneficiaries, may not increase the beneficiaries' distributable share of trust income above the amount received. 2. Fee paid by the beneficiary to lawyers representing her in such contested accounting is not deductible by her.

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTA BLISS REESE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Reese v. Commissioner

Docket No. 62424.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 565; 1933 BTA LEXIS 926;

December 14, 1933, Promulgated

1. A fee paid by a trustee to a referee in a contested accounting, which under the trust is a factor which reduces trust income distributable to beneficiaries, may not increase the beneficiaries' distributable share of trust income above the amount received.

2. Fee paid by the beneficiary to lawyers representing her in such contested accounting is not deductible by her.

Laurence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reese v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API