Katzenberger v. Lawo
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM SIIBLBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. II. Estes, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.
By a collision on one of the streets of Memphis between a wagon driven by Lawo and a dummy-train of street-ears * he sustained such bodily injuries as have resulted in a judgment for $3,000 against plaintiff in error, who, as receiver, was operating the railway at the time.
*237The Circuit Judge charged the jury that the statutory precautions required to be observed by railroads, and contained in Subsection 4 of §1166, Code of Tennessee, applied to the movement of all railway trains upon the streets of Memphis, and that a dummy-line was a railroad within the meaning of this provision.
Each of these…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. HensilIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. PrattTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by15 opinions
- Byrne v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Massachusetts Loan & Trust Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Law County Board v. SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Baker v. McCarthySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.