Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Rush Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 9, 2024No. 1:19-cv-00105Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM LEE JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00105-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO PRETRIAL ORDER; PRETRIAL PROCEDURES; 13 v. ALLOWING LIMITED TESTIMONY BY VIDEOCONFERENCE AND USE OF 14 NATURAL GAS FUEL SYSTEMS, INC. INDEPENDENT COURT REPORTER FOR D.B.A. MOMENTUM FUEL PREPARATION OF UNOFFICIAL 15 TECHNOLOGY, et al., TRANSCRIPT 16 Defendants. (ECF No. 165) 17 18 A. Trial Briefs 19 In the amended pretrial order (ECF No. 165), the Court permitted that trial briefs were 20 optional. However, the Court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennie G. Carr v. Charles WattsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Lester Nehring v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas ArgentinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Rogers v. DE VRIES & COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1964
- Willie Moore, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellee v. South African Marine Corporation, Ltd., and the M/v S.A. Nederburg, South African Marine Corporation, Ltd., Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Gulf Stevedore Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972