Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Paterno

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

The above actions are for alleged negligence. They apparently arise out of the same transaction, viz., the collision of two boats on one of the Saranac lakes in Franklin county.

The defendant in each case is a resident of Bronx county. The plaintiff John R. Dunlap claims to be a resident of Franklin county. His residence is questioned by the defendant. The other two plaintiffs are residents of New York city and county. The papers indicate that a greater number of material witnesses, not including the parties, reside in Franklin county than reside in New York city.

The defendant moves to change…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. CummiskeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Culver v. Union National Bank of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Buxbaum v. PaulsenNew York Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API