Legal Opinion

People v. Winterheld

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1960No. Docket 92, Calendar 47,955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Is evidence obtained through unlawful search and seizure in another State, by its officers, admissible in a criminal case in this State, or should it be suppressed on motion seasonably made before trial 1

A Federal question, under the 4th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States is not presented. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 US 25 (69 S Ct 1359, 93 L ed 1782); Irvine v. California, 347 US 128 (74 S Ct 381, 98 L ed 561). As for Rea v. United States, 350 US 214 (76 S Ct 292, 100 L ed 233), in which it was held that a Federal district court, upon application, should have enjoined a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Rea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. WinterheldMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. GoldstonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API