Hedstrom v. Sullivan
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff seeks judicial review of the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ (Secretary) decision that she is not disabled and, therefore not entitled to supplemental security income benefits. Having reviewed the record and the briefs under the substantial evidence standard, I hold that the Secretary’s determination that there exists substantial gainful work in the national economy which plaintiff can perform is not supported by substantial evidence. Because additional fact-finding would serve no purpose…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rhonda Kay RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Benjamin S. GOSSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Franklin B. BERNAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Wanda TALLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Sharon N. RAGLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Knuutila v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Gutierrez v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Zagorianakos v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Cira v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.