Legal Opinion

Francisco v. Miller

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 5, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

14 N.J. Super. 290 (1951)

81 A.2d 803

RUSSELL FRANCISCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MARY C. MILLER AND LOLA M. WALKEY, EXECUTRICES OF THE WILL OF CHARLES M. HERMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 21, 1951.

Decided June 5, 1951.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. James R. Laird argued the cause for appellant (Mr. John A. Hartpence, of counsel).

Mr. William H.D. Cox argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

By way of a preface to the discussion…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Phillips v. Library Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  3. Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Oelschlaeger v. Hahne & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Schnatterer v. BambergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Racquet Club of BricktownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Dwyer v. Skyline Apartments, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Gould v. WinokurNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Brown v. SIOUX BUILDING CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Mikrut v. PellowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API