Legal Opinion

State v. Harden

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 4, 2005No. 2005AP262-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

¶ 1. Kenneth Harden appeals a judgment convicting him of delivering cocaine and THC, and an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. The State concedes that Harden was misinformed about the maximum prison sentence the court could impose for these crimes. Relying on State v. Quiroz, 2002 WI App 52, ¶ 16, 251 Wis. 2d 245, 641 N.W.2d 715, the trial court ruled that Harden failed to present credible evidence that the misinformation affected his plea decisions. Because we conclude Harden's pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered and he was not required to establish that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BarteltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Nommensen v. American Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State v. QuirozCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. State v. MertenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  3. State v. RoouCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. State v. LisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API