Legal Opinion

State v. Damask

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 17, 1996No. 78826, 78843PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The question we decide is whether drug enforcement traffic checkpoints operated by law enforcement officials in Franklin and Texas Counties are constitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 15 of the Missouri Constitution. Because the checkpoints were operated in a nondiscriminatory fashion as to the initial stops and because the checkpoints effectively advance an important state interest with minimal intrusion to motorists, we find such checkpoints constitutional. The trial courts’ decisions to suppress the evidence…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. State v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. State v. KrileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API