Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Town of Greenburgh

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action upon a contract.

1Opinion of the CourtSeeger, J.

This is an action in equity which was commenced by Francis T. Holder, plaintiff’s testator, in the year 1904. The plaintiff Coyne, his surviving executor, was subsequently substituted as party plain*600tiff by an order of the court. The action arises but of a contract between the Warbnrton avenue extension commission, so called, and Pennell & 0 ’Hern, contractors, under chapter 493, Laws of 1892, for the extension of Warbnrton avenue, in the town of Green-burgh, from the north line of the city and town of Yonkers to the village of Hastings. Francis T. Holder was the contractors’ assignee.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Lorillard v. . the Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Atlantic Dock Co. v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coyne v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API