Legal Opinion

Goerges Et Ux. v. Reading Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1948No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithbich, J.,

Plaintiffs brought this action in trespass against the Reading Company to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a result of a fall by the wife plaintiff on the sidewalk of the defendant’s premises on Chestnut Street between 17th and 18th Streets in the City of Harrisburg.

The statement of claim alleged, inter alia, that defendant was negligent in failing to fill in a trench that had been opened on its property, thereby creating a depression in the sidewalk. The Reading Company, proceeding under Rule No. 2252 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, joined Samuel C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Borough of Brookville v. ArthursSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Fowler v. Borough of Jersey ShoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Philadelphia Co. v. Central Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Reymer v. Consolidated Ice Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Third-Party v. Erie Avenue Warehouse Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Alpha Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. Mixter v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Deutsch v. P., C. & Y. Railway, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API