Amaya v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Judge.
The indictment charged that the appellant did “transport within, and import into, the County of Webb, in the State of Texas, by carrying same in his hands and upon his person” intoxicating liquor. The foundation of the prosecution is attacked upon the ground that Section 3, of Chapter 24, Laws Thirty-fifth Legislature, Fourth Called Session, page 37, were inoperative at the date of the offense, June 9, 1919. Ex parte Myer 84 Texas Crim. Rep., 288; 207 S. W. Rep., 100, is not authority supporting the appellant’s proposition. The same attack was made on Section 1 of the Act in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Easterwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Ex Parte MeyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Bundick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Busey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte BronsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Hoffman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- De Leon v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- State v. EstesTexas Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.