Hukill v. Tharp
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brror from District Court, Ottawa County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by J. T. Hukill and others against J. B. Tharp and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734, 124 Pac. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857, 124 Pac. 59.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Rice v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. RathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913