Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

SANCTUARY HOUSE, INC. v. Krause

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 3, 2008No. 07SA310Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Coats

I would make the rule absolute because I believe the district court erred, as a matter of law, in finding Chaffee County to be an improper venue. The plaintiffs claims are clearly personal in nature, and the district court appears to have jurisdiction over both the subject matter of the claims and the parties. Although there may be adequate *1261reason from the reported cases of this court to conclude otherwise, I believe that C.R.C.P. 98(a), which circumscribes permissible venues for actions having real property as their subject, is properly construed to apply only to actions that are, with minor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jameson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  2. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Centennial Petroleum, Inc. v. CarterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API