Legal Opinion

James Courtney v. Jeffrey Goltz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 2, 2013No. 12-35392PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:

James and Clifford Courtney challenge Washington statutes that require a certificate of “public convenience and necessity” (“PCN”) in order to operate a ferry on Lake Chelan in central Washington state. The Courtneys claim that these state laws abridge their right to use the navigable waters of the United States, in violation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission and its various officers and directors (collectively, “WUTC”) successfully moved to dismiss the case and this appeal…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Slidewaters LLC v. Washington State Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. John Sturgeon v. Sue MasicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Courtney v. DannerSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Endir Briseno v. Robet A. BontaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API