Legal Opinion

Farlow v. Barton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 1939No. 27476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It appears from the undisputed evidence that plaintiffs contracted with defendants to pay for collision insurance to cover the automobile purchased for a period of 18 months, and that the defendants were under contractual obligation to procure such insurance for plaintiffs’ benefit. It also appears that defendants failed to do this, and at the time of the wreck of plaintiffs’ automobile by a collision it was not covered by insurance which the defendants had contracted with the plaintiffs to procure. The evidence which was offered and. objected to by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Swain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  4. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Grace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Five Points Parking CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Sutker v. Pennsylvania InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. S & a CORPORATION v. Berger & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. WinfreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Redmond v. Petty Motor Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API