Legal Opinion

101 Park Avenue Associates v. Trane Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (99 AD2d 428). Respondent Trane, as an unpaid subcontractor, has an unqualified right to a mechanic’s lien upon the improved real property (Lien Law, § 3). Petitioners have failed to show a basis for discharge of that lien pursuant to section 19 of the Lien Law as the undertaking filed covers only the lien of the contractor Raisler Corporation.

*736Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. 101 Park Avenue Associates v. Trane Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blake Electric Contracting Co. v. PaschallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Pavarini McGovern, LLC v. Waterscape Resort LLC (In re Waterscape Resort LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. W & W Glass, LLC v. 1113 York Avenue Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. W & W Glass, LLC v. 1113 York Avenue Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API