Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Voss

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided April 15, 1905Published

1Opinion of the CourtHoeeheimer, J.

Heard on motion for a new trial.

This matter came on to be heard on a motion for a new trial. The action was on a promissory note. The co-defendant, Robert Moorman, made no defense. Defendant Voss urged several defenses. He claimed to be a surety merely; that, as such, he gave Mrs. Morman, the principal creditor, sufficient notice to proceed to suit against defendant Moorman, as required by law. He also claimed that she was the owner of the note, but that, as a matter of fact, Frank Moorman, her' husband, was the owner of the note, Verdict was for plaintiff.

*146Several grounds are assigned for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McMaster v. . Pres., Etc., Ins. Co. of N. Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Orleans County National Bank v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Stamford Bank v. BenedictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  4. Halstead v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Sapington v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API