Legal Opinion

Wabash R. R. v. Finnegan

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 17, 1946No. 3190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

This cause, to recover taxes paid under protest to defendant by plaintiff, alleged by defendant to be due under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code, § 1600 et seq., and the Carriers’ Taxing Act of 1937, 45 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) was tried on stipulation of facts, exhibits, and deposition of one witness.

The controversy results from the practice of plaintiff in contracting with J. M. Farrin and Company (called “contractor”) in connection with work on plaintiff’s railroad. The contracts, twenty in number, bear…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Mine La Motte CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Downs v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  3. Reynolds v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API