Legal Opinion

Hoef v. Hoef

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1926No. 17568. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heard

Plaintiff in error, Theodosia Hoef, and defendant in error, John Hoef, were married in. 1901 and resided together at Steeleville, Randolph comity, until April 5, 1924, at which time he left the home where he had been residing with his wife and three children, Verna, Milton and Wilbert, aged, respectively, eighteen, fifteen and twelve years at the time of the trial. Thereafter plaintiff in error filed her bill in the circuit court of Randolph county for separate maintenance for herself and children. Defendant in error answered, denying that he had failed to support his wife and children and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smiths v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Snell v. WeldonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Blake v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Razor v. RazorIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Montgomery v. BrushIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caulk v. CaulkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Wolfrum v. WolfrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. Clanton v. CLANTONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Farmers Trust & Savings Bank v. DonnellyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Majewski v. MajewskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API