Alexis Edelstein v. Tara Michelle Nelson
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 ALEXIS EDELSTEIN, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00003-GMN-MDC 6 Petitioner, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR vs. ATTORNEY’S FEES (ECF NO. 46) 8 9 TARA MICHELLE NELSON, Respondent. 10 11 I was referred the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 46)(“Motion”) by respondent Tara 12 Michelle Nelson (“Nelson”) per 28 USC 636. For the reasons below, I RECOMMEND the Motion be 13 DENIED. 14 DISCUSSION 15 I. RELEVANT FACTS 16 This is a matter under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child 17 Abduction (“Hague…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. James A. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Philippine Air Lines, a Corporation, and Qantas Airways, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. GianelliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.