Legal Opinion

Alexis Edelstein v. Tara Michelle Nelson

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided November 12, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00003Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 ALEXIS EDELSTEIN, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00003-GMN-MDC 6 Petitioner, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR vs. ATTORNEY’S FEES (ECF NO. 46) 8 9 TARA MICHELLE NELSON, Respondent. 10 11 I was referred the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 46)(“Motion”) by respondent Tara 12 Michelle Nelson (“Nelson”) per 28 USC 636. For the reasons below, I RECOMMEND the Motion be 13 DENIED. 14 DISCUSSION 15 I. RELEVANT FACTS 16 This is a matter under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child 17 Abduction (“Hague…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. James A. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Philippine Air Lines, a Corporation, and Qantas Airways, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. GianelliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API