Legal Opinion

Couch & Gilliland v. Home Protective Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Grayson. Tried below before Hon. J. D. Woods.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKHOUT, Associate Justice.

—This suit was instituted by the firm of .Couch & Gilliland against the appellee, as defendant, to recover the amount of an insurance policy. A trial was had, and a verdict returned for defendant by instruction of the court. Plaintiffs appealed.

1. The first assignment complains of the ruling of the court on the exception of the plaintiff to that part of the answer setting up the iron safe clause of the policy. It is insisted that the iron safe clause, which was on a slip of paper attached to said policy, is not a warranty by plaintiffs, but is only a representation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Georgia Home Insurance v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Sisk v. American Central Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Occidental Fire Ins. v. Fort Worth Grain & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Ætna Accident & Liability Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Southern Travelers' Ass'n v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Commonwealth Ins. Co. of New York v. FinegoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API