Anderson v. Mackay
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
Laoombe, Circuit Judge.
The decision in Ex parte Fisk, 113 U. S. 713, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 724, does not cover an examination of a defendant to enable plaintiff to frame a complaint, nor do any of the other cases cited hold that such an examination cannot be held in a federal court, in an action at law, when it could be had in the state court under state practice. The reason for reversing the decision of this court assigned in Ex parte Fisk, viz., that the federal statutes had specially provided a different mode of taking testimony to be used on the trial, does not apply in this case, where no such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Donnelly v. Anderson Brown & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Kirkpatrick v. Pope Manuf'g Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1894
- Frescole v. City of LancasterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895