Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Peek
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
The dispute between the parties is whether the term “insured” as it appears in the exclusionary-provision relied upon by plaintiff is used severally to mean only the particular insured claiming coverage or collectively to mean the named insured together with any other person claiming coverage as an “insured” within the definition of the term.
However, this dispute, which requires a construction of the policy provisions and leads to an ultimate determination of the parties’ rights and obligations, is not for consideration of this court upon the plaintiff’s exceptions to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Mensinger v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Griffin v. Hardware Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Buffington v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Ditmyer v. American Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- LaSalle National Insurance v. PophamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Famble v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.