Legal Opinion

Reinken v. Reinken

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1933No. 21576. Demurrer sustainedPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

Dietrich G. Reinken, defendant in error, filed a bill for divorce from Louise Marion Ellis Reinken, plaintiff in error, in the circuit court of Cook county. The cause was tried without a jury upon issues raised by the bill of complaint and a cross-bill filed by plaintiff in error. At the earliest opportunity counsel for plaintiff in error moved for the impaneling of a jury, which motion was denied because the statutory fee of eight dollars required under section 33 of the Fees and Salaries act (Smith’s Stat. 1931, chap. 53, p. 1500,) had not been paid. Exceptions were preserved to the court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. People ex rel. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Boylan v. BoylanIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Holt v. ReesIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Moore v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Scott v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar v. General Motors Corporation Leo Burnett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Qaid Rafeeq Azeez and Abdullah Muhammad v. James W. Fairman, Warden, John E. Wright, Asst. Warden, and A. Dodge, 120 (c.o.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Stevie StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago Ex Rel. O'Keeffe v. Ingram Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lemon v. LemonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API