Legal Opinion

Cheezy Pulliam v. Earnest Chad Rash, individually and in his official capacity for the City of West Memphis

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 16, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00148Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION CHEEZY PULLIAM PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 2:24-CV-00148-BSM EARNEST CHAD RASH, individually and in his official capacity for the City of West Memphis DEFENDANT ORDER Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s individual capacity claims [Doc. No. 36] is denied on all claims except outrage and his motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s official capacity claims [Doc. No. 29] is granted. I. BACKGROUND The undisputed facts as set forth in plaintiff’s response to defendant’s statements of undisputed material…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API