Legal Opinion

State v. Woods

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 4, 1939No. 14815PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice. Fishburne.

In the opinion prepared in this case by Mr. Justice Baker, he reaches the conclusion that the judgment below should be affirmed as to the appellant, William B. Woods, but, for the reasons stated by him, he holds that a new trial should be ordered for the other five appellants. With reference to the appellants other than Woods, he sustains certain exceptions which charge error to the trial Judge in his instructions tO' the jury.

We concur in the decision of all of the questions discussed and passed upon by Mr. Justice Baker except…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Collins-Plass Thayer Co. v. HewlettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  3. Boggero v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. Sharpton v. Augusta & Aiken Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PlathSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. GunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. WhitenerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API