Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 25, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2703PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is a trade-mark registration interference proceeding in which Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, has appealed from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding to Sears, Roebuck & Co. priority of use and right of registration of the word “Sta-IOean” for use on ammunition in Patent Office class 9, explosives, firearms, equipments, and projectiles, and denying to appellant right of registration of the word “Staelean” for use on the same type of goods.

The goods upon which the respective parties are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. HudnutCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Blue Bell, Inc. v. Jaymar-Ruby, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Jim Dandy Co. ex rel. Western Grain Co. v. Martha White Foods, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. Li'L' Red Barn, Inc. v. Red Barn System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API