Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Hunnewell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Practice in the Supreme Court. Parties. Service. Before the Supreme Court. February Term, 1880. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

A motion was made by counsel for defendant in error to dismiss this case for want of proper service.

The case itself arose on a motion in the court below to enter up a judgment upon a verdict which had been rendered against the defendant in a distress warrant, against the said defendant and his two securities on the replevy bond for the condemnation money found in said verdict. This motion was resisted upon several grounds; issues were formed thereon, and upon the trial a ■ verdict was found for the defendants ; the plaintiff being dissatisfied with the rulings of the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curey v. HitchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hogans v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Lawrence v. Lee's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API