Legal Opinion

Kobacker Furniture Co. v. Huggins

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

This is an action in replevin under an unrecorded conditional sales contract, copy of which is presented on this motion. The property sold consisted of household furniture exempt under section 665 of the Civil Practice Act. Though the answer denies the material allegations of the complaint, it also affirmatively alleges the purchase and does not claim it was not conditional or that the purchase price was fully paid.

For an affirmative defense, the answer alleges that the defendant filed a petition in involuntary bankruptcy, was adjudicated bankrupt and that among the assets listed was exempt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Raz Delivery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. DukeNew York County Court, Kings County · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API