Legal Opinion

Dentes v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yesawich, Jr., J.

Proceeding pursuant to *758CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to prohibit implementation of two orders of respondent County Judge of Tompkins County which disqualified petitioner from prosecuting a certain criminal action.

Petitioner, the Tompkins County District Attorney, seeks to restrain enforcement of an order of respondent County Judge of Tompkins County which disqualified petitioner and his staff from prosecuting second degree murder charges leveled against respondent Ernest W. Vann, and appointed a special prosecutor to do so (see, County…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kavanagh v. VogtNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Morgenthau v. CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Kavanagh v. VogtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cloke v. PulverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Soares v. HerrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Reina v. CoccomaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Rivette v. McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API