Legal Opinion

Frary v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1932No. 30,422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

In an action prosecuted under the workmen’s compensation act as it existed previous to 1927 judgment was rendered *217against the employer. An appeal to this court was dismissed. After the time for filing a petition for rehearing had expired, and after the mandate of this court had been transmitted to the district court and had been spread of record there, an application to file a petition for rehearing was filed, and was denied. The employer then filed a motion in the district court to set aside the judgment as void. The motion was denied, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Routh v. List & Weatherly Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Frary v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cruse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API