Frary v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
In an action prosecuted under the workmen’s compensation act as it existed previous to 1927 judgment was rendered *217against the employer. An appeal to this court was dismissed. After the time for filing a petition for rehearing had expired, and after the mandate of this court had been transmitted to the district court and had been spread of record there, an application to file a petition for rehearing was filed, and was denied. The employer then filed a motion in the district court to set aside the judgment as void. The motion was denied, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Routh v. List & Weatherly Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Frary v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cruse v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944