Legal Opinion

Bradley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 21, 1990No. Nos. 89-1435, 89-1436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, Judge.

We reverse the departure sentences imposed in these consolidated appeals. While the timing of offenses may constitute a clear and convincing reason for departure, the offenses must establish a continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity. State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988). Without a recitation by the trial court of additional facts supporting the timing of offenses, the fact that appellant committed three offenses in a ten-day period does not demonstrate a continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity. See State v. Simpson, 554 So.2d 506 (Fla.1989);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RousseauSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API