Legal Opinion
Hammes v. City of Davenport
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided May 21, 2019No. Case No. 3:18-cv-00111-SMR-SBJPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHANIE M. ROSE, JUDGE
Before the Court is a motion by Defendant City of Davenport, Iowa (the "City"), to dismiss the Complaint of pro se Plaintiff Jesse Hammes. [ECF No. 5]. The motion is fully submitted and ready for decision. Neither party has requested oral argument on the motion, and the Court finds the issues can be resolved without it. See LR 7(c). For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff is a resident of the City whose home is located on a parcel of land that abuts Pheasant Creek. His claims arise from erosion damage to his property caused…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- James Solomon v. Deputy U.S. Marshal ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- The Branson Label, Inc. v. City of BransonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Natural Resources Defense Council San Diego Baykeeper, Kenneth J. Moser v. Southwest Marine, Inc.,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Mains v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Funderburk v. South Carolina Electric & Gas CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Garrison v. New Fashion Pork LLPDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
- Garrison v. New Fashion Pork LLPDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
- Vitiello v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020