Legal Opinion
William P. Andrews v. Consolidated Rail Corporation and United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 27, 1987No. 86-1233PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
William P. Andrews, the plaintiff-appellant, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his claims against Consolidated Rail Corporation and the Department of Labor. We affirm.
I
The plaintiff-appellant, William P. Andrews, was employed by Penn Central Transportation in 1970 as a stockman when he suffered injuries in January and May of that year necessitating that he discontinue working; in 1973, Penn Central and the plaintiff reached an agreement specifying that Andrews forego presenting himself for reemployment with Penn Central for a period of five years (until…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Linda Morse v. University of VermontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Wolsky v. Medical College Of Hampton RoadsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Doe v. Southeastern UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Deanna Cheeney v. Highland Community College, Michael Bredberg v. Rock Falls Township High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.