Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 13, 1983No. AR-132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s order granting Campbell’s motion to suppress evidence. The officer (a wildlife officer with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission) who stopped and detained Campbell and his vehicle did not have sufficient information that criminal activity was afoot to justify a brief investigatory stop. United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). Nor did Campbell’s operation of his vehicle justify the officer’s stopping Campbell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. State v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. HarmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API