Legal Opinion
Carl Schenck, A.G. v. Nortron Corp.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided December 21, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-3278Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.
The plaintiff Carl Schenck A.G. brings this action to recover damages for an alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,182,511 (the “511” patent or “Federn” patent). For the reasons stated, this Court concludes that the plaintiff should prevail on its claim of patent infringement. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52, the following will constitute the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The plaintiff alleges that the defendant Nortron Corporation’s Model 7402 wheel balancing machine incorporates the invention described in claims 1, 2 and 5 of the 511…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc., Caribe Chemical Company, Inc., Ellencee Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.