Legal Opinion
Ray v. University of Tulsa, Works & Lentz, Inc. (In Re Ray)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 12, 2002No. 16-10434PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, Bankruptcy Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Motion for Attorney’s Fees, as supplemented (the “Fee Motion”), filed by Trisza Leann Ray, Plaintiff herein (“Plaintiff’ or “Ms. Ray”), and the Re sponses to the Motion for Attorneys Fees filed by the University of Tulsa (the “University”). The following findings and conclusions are made pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52.
Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1334(b). 1 Reference to the Court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rita A. Toth, and Sondra J. Thornally, Esq., Claimant-Appellant v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Laca v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024