Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Brecher

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

This is a motion for an order pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was employed by the corporate defendant and that the individual defendant, in his capacity as a corporate officer, stated to three employees, including the plaintiff, the following: ‘ ‘ Mr. Cohn, there is a hundred-dollar bill missing and only you three had access to it, Mr. Cohn, and I want that money returned or else I will fire you,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gross v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Feely v. Vitagraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API