Cohn v. Brecher
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.
This is a motion for an order pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was employed by the corporate defendant and that the individual defendant, in his capacity as a corporate officer, stated to three employees, including the plaintiff, the following: ‘ ‘ Mr. Cohn, there is a hundred-dollar bill missing and only you three had access to it, Mr. Cohn, and I want that money returned or else I will fire you,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gross v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Feely v. Vitagraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918